Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Rogers v. Commissioner Social Security Administration
as 6:2023cv00457
Plaintiff:
David Britt Rogers
Defendant:
Commissioner Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383 Review of HHS Decision
Woodroffe v. Lincoln County Community Justice et al
as 6:2021cv01053
Plaintiff:
Robert Woodroffe
Defendant:
Lincoln County Community Justice, Tony Campa, Susie O'Toole and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Storkson v. Google LLC
as 3:2018cv02039
Plaintiff:
Britt Storkson
Defendant:
Google LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2018cv02010
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Britt v. USA
as 3:2016cv02098
Petitioner:
Landon Britt
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Britt v. USA
as 3:2016cv01121
Petitioner:
Robert Todd Britt
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Guttman v. City of Portland et al
as 3:2014cv00937
Defendant:
Garry Britt, City of Portland, Aaron Cole and others
Plaintiff:
Clint Guttman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rhodes Sr et al v. Portland Police Department et al
as 3:2013cv01193
Defendant:
Officer Britt, Officer Congdon, Officer Cox and others
Plaintiff:
Jeffery Rhodes Sr and Kim Thompson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013cv00155
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation v. Christensen et al
as 3:2013cv00109
Defendant:
Charles F. Beardsley, William A. Booth, Roger Christensen and others
Plaintiff:
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
503) 226-0259 (fax:
Adam R. Kelly
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Other
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
