Cases 1 - 10 of 25
HOWARD v. BROTON
as 4:2024cv00187
Petitioner:
KIRK H0WARD
Respondent:
JENNIFER A BROTON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Raymond Gill v. Jennifer Broton, et al
as 24-11236
Plaintiff:
RAYMOND EDWARD GILL
Defendant:
JENNIFER A. BROTON, AVERY, B. PAVIGLIQNTI and others
Gill v. Broton et al
as 5:2024cv00090
Plaintiff:
Raymond Edward Gill
Defendant:
Warden Jennifer A. Broton, Assistant Warden Avery, B. Pavigliqnti and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Broton v. Walmart, Inc.
as 0:2024cv60139
Plaintiff:
Eric Broton
Defendant:
Walmart, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Personal Injury
Rivera-Rodriguez v. Warden, FCC Coleman-Medium
as 8:2024cv00199
Petitioner:
Gabriel Rivera-Rodriguez
Respondent:
Jennifer A. Broton and Warden, FCC Coleman - Medium
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Rivera-Rodriguez v. Broton
as 5:2024cv00034
Petitioner:
Gabriel Rivera-Rodriguez
Respondent:
Jennifer A. Broton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Ingram v. Broton
as 3:2023cv00641
Petitioner:
Kevin Ingram
Respondent:
J. Broton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Broton v. Onondaga County et al
as 5:2022cv00135
Plaintiff:
Shawn Broton
Defendant:
Onondaga County, Onondaga County Board of Ethics, William J. Fitzpatrick and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Montoya v. Federal Bureau of Prisons
as 1:2021cv23368
Plaintiff:
Carlos Montoya
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, Warden Sylvester L. Jenkins, Assistant Warden Jennifer Broton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Van Sach v. Maybury et al
as 3:2021cv50170
Defendant:
Gamble, B. Mullins, C. Broton and others
Plaintiff:
Joseph Van Sach
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
