Cases 11 - 20 of 1,181
US v. Michael Brown
as 23-7234
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
MICHAEL SHAWN BROWN
US v. Carissa Brown
as 23-4722
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
CARISSA EUGENIA BROWN
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00192
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Northern Virginia Hemp v. Commonwealth of VA
as 23-2192
Plaintiff / Appellant:
NORTHERN VIRGINIA HEMP AND AGRICULTURE, LLC, ROSE LANE and FRANNY'S OPERATIONS, INC.
Defendant / Appellee:
THE COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA, GLENN YOUNGKIN, Governor of the Commonwealth of Virginia, in his official capacity, JASON S. MIYARES, Attorney General for the Commonwealth of Virginia, in his official capacity and others
US v. Meko Brown, Jr.
as 23-4680
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
MEKO MONTEZ BROWN, JR., a/k/a Gangsta, a/k/a 9-Ball
First Kuwaiti General Trading & Contracting W.L.L. v. Kellogg Brown & Root International, Incorporated
as 23-2121
Respondent / Appellee:
KELLOGG BROWN & ROOT INTERNATIONAL, INCORPORATED
Petitioner / Appellant:
FIRST KUWAITI GENERAL TRADING & CONTRACTING W.L.L.
US v. Derrick Brown
as 23-4629
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
DERRICK JABBAR BROWN, a/k/a Derrick Brown
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv05025
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv04848
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00611
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
