Cases 1 - 10 of 47
(PC) McPherson v. Newman et al
as 2:2024cv00354
Plaintiff:
Michael Bruce Anthony McPherson
Defendant:
Kendall J. Newman and William B. Shubb
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thomas v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2023cv01243
Plaintiff:
Bruce Anthony Thomas
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Lewis v. Sloan
as 3:2023cv00308
Plaintiff:
Bruce Anthony Lewis
Defendant:
Deandre Lamar Sloan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Iorio v. State of Nevada et al
as 2:2023cv01157
Plaintiff:
Bruce Anthony Iorio
Defendant:
State of Nevada, Clark County Family Court, Child Protective Services and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
(HC) McPherson v. Warden
as 2:2023cv01014
Petitioner:
Michael Bruce Anthony McPherson
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(PC) McPherson v. Green et al
as 2:2023cv00811
Plaintiff:
Michael Bruce Anthony McPherson
Defendant:
J. Green, C. Padelford, M. Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
USA v. Bruce Rolley
as 22-14281
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
BRUCE ANTHONY ROLLEY
Blain Lomen v. Thomas P. Schmalzried et al
as 2:2022cv03302
Defendant:
Medical Device Business Services, Incorporated, Thomas P Schmalzried, M.D., Thomas P. Schmalzried M.D. a Professional Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
Blaine Lomen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Product Liability
Adams v. Fernandes, et al
as 3:2022cv00120
Plaintiff:
TYRONE REGINALD ADAMS
Defendant:
BRUCE ANTHONY FERNANDES and ATL LOGISTICS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bruce Tamulis v. CIR
as 21-2661
Petitioner / Appellant:
BRUCE ANTHONY TAMULIS
Respondent / Appellee:
COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
