Cases 1 - 10 of 32
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00240
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Ford v. Pitt County Memorial Hospital Inc. et al
as 5:2024cv00071
Plaintiff:
Jarred J. Ford
Defendant:
Pitt County Memorial Hospital Inc. d/b/a ECU Health Inc., a/k/a Vidant Medical Center, Claudia E. Goettler, Michael R. Bard and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Brunson v. Herring
as 5:2023hc02152
Petitioner:
Jonathan Eugene Brunson
Respondent:
John Herring
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Scottsdale Insurance Company v. Kaylor et al
as 5:2022cv00513
Plaintiff:
Scottsdale Insurance Company
Defendant:
Joseph M. Kaylor, Eastern Fabricators, LLC and Frederick Brunson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
Brunson v. Cumberland County Detention Center
as 5:2022hc02172
Petitioner:
Daryus Brunson
Respondent:
Cumberland County Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Brunson v. Stein et al
as 5:2021ct03063
Defendant:
Yolanda K. Stith, Emily M. Baucom, James C. Gillen and others
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Eugene Brunson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BRUNSON v. SAUL
as 1:2020cv00721
Defendant:
ANDREW SAUL
Plaintiff:
CONNIE BRUNSON
Interested Party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 206
Brunson v. USA
as 5:2020cv00300
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Frantonio Lee Brunson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
BRUNSON v. MCNEIL
as 1:2019cv00708
Defendant:
LLOYD TIMOTHY MCNEIL
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL BRUNSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Brunson v. Hooks
as 5:2019hc02191
Respondent:
Erik A. Hooks
Petitioner:
Jonathan Eugene Brunson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
