Cases 1 - 10 of 466
Bryan v. Indivior Inc. et al.
as 1:2024sf65393
Plaintiff:
Cindy L Bryan
Defendant:
Indivior Inc., Indivior PLC, Indivior Solutions Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Jackson v. City of Canton et al.
as 5:2024cv00740
Plaintiff:
Destinee N. Jackson
Defendant:
City of Canton, Lieutenant Lester Marino, Sergeant Bryan McWilliams and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Hill v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01695
Plaintiff:
Bryan Hill
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Bryan v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01630
Plaintiff:
James Bryan
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Allen v. Warden, Southeastern Correctional Institution
as 1:2024cv00185
Petitioner:
Bryan S. Allen
Defendant:
Warden, Southeastern Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Braunskill v. Smith et al
as 1:2024cv00140
Plaintiff:
Ralphiell Braunskill
Defendant:
Agent Danielle Smith, Clermont Co. Sheriff Dept., Jane Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Greer v. Harreld et al
as 1:2024cv00118
Plaintiff:
Steven E. Greer
Defendant:
Susan Harreld, Michael Harreld, Sr., Sarah Conroy Greer and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Walter v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv00810
Plaintiff:
Bryan Walter
Defendant:
Davol Inc and C.R Bard Inc
Harris v. USA
as 4:2024cv00343
Petitioner:
Bryan Harris
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Wolfe v. USA
as 1:2024cv00328
Petitioner:
Bryan Shane Wolfe
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
