Cases 1 - 10 of 793
White v. Stirling
as 0:2024cv02595
Petitioner:
Gary A. White, Jr.
Respondent:
Bryan Stirling
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Adams v. Stirling
as 0:2024cv02603
Plaintiff:
Kent Adams
Defendant:
Bryan P. Stirling
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr (Other)
Al-Haqq v. Mims et al
as 2:2024cv01899
Plaintiff:
Bilal A. Al-Haqq
Defendant:
Mr Mims, Ms. Butler, Staci Richardson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Frye v. South Carolina Department of Corrections, The et al
as 5:2024cv01893
Plaintiff:
Marion Wade Frye
Defendant:
South Carolina Department of Corrections, The, Director Bryan Sterling, Kenneth Nelson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Marshall v. Sterling
as 1:2024cv01769
Plaintiff:
Mimi Joe Marshall
Defendant:
Bryan P. Sterling
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Wilson v. Ofc. Calvin Brown et al
as 3:2024cv01745
Plaintiff:
Bryan Montiea Wilson
Defendant:
Ofc. Calvin Brown and Ofc. David Thompson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr (Other)
McCray v. Stirling et al
as 9:2024cv01638
Plaintiff:
James Roosevelt McCray
Defendant:
Cpt. Bryan P. Stirling, Cpt. B Bibbs, Lt. Coata Kimbrell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Johnson v. Stirling et al
as 5:2024cv01625
Plaintiff:
Tyrese Dashawn Johnson
Defendant:
Bryan P. Stirling, Shane Jackson and Jane Doe(Postal Director)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Frye v. Sterling
as 5:2024cv01585
Petitioner:
Marion Wade Frye
Respondent:
Bryan Sterling
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jordan v. South Carolina, State of et al
as 2:2024cv01443
Plaintiff:
Joshua Bryan Jordan
Defendant:
South Carolina, State of, Charleston Police Department and Matthew Stubbs
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr (Other)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
