Cases 1 - 10 of 34
TESTAVERDE v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv13774
Plaintiff:
BRYAN MATTHEW TESTAVERDE
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Cooney v. United States of America
as 6:2022cv01600
Petitioner:
Bryan Matthew Cooney
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
PETERSON v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv13905
Plaintiff:
BRYAN MATTHEW PETERSON
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
BEISELL v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv12374
Plaintiff:
BRYAN MATTHEW BEISELL
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Poole v. Greenville County Detention Center et al
as 9:2022cv02591
Plaintiff:
Bryan Matthew Poole
Defendant:
Greenville County Detention Center and Officer Lane
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
RENTFROW v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2022cv07183
Plaintiff:
BRYAN MATTHEW RENTFROW
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
HOULE v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv52991
Plaintiff:
BRYAN MATTHEW HOULE
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Zaher v. Saul
as 3:2020cv00254
Defendant:
Andrew Saul
Plaintiff:
Bryan Matthew Zaher
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
PARYLAK v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv72148
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
BRYAN MATTHEW PARYLAK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MATTHEWS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv67659
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
BRYAN MATTHEWS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
