Cases filed in the Sixth Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Watson v. Lemaster
as 0:2021cv00077
Petitioner: Bryan Watson
Respondent: Lemaster
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Bryan Watson v. USA
as 21-2728
Petitioner / Appellant: BRYAN WATSON
Respondent / Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Smith v. Hansberry et al
as 2:2020cv12789
Plaintiff: Kaycee Smith
Defendant: David Hansberry, Amy Matelic, Bryan Watson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Anthony McCallum, et al v. Stephen Geelhood, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 17-1418
Plaintiff - Appellee: ANTHONY MCCALLUM and ELAINE MCCALLUM
Defendant - Appellant: STEPHEN GEELHOOD, AMY MATELIC, BRYAN WATSON and others
USA v. Bryan Watson
as 17-1391
Plaintiff - Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant: BRYAN WATSON
USA v. Bryan Watson We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 17-1205
Plaintiff - Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant: BRYAN WATSON
Carr v. Hansberry et al
as 2:2016cv10678
Plaintiff: Thomas Carr
Defendant: David Hansberry, Andre Rupert , Bryan Watson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
McCallum et al v. Geelhood et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2015cv12676
Defendant: Stephen Geelhood , Amy Matelic , Bryan Watson and others
Plaintiff: Anthony McCallum and Elaine McCallum
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
McCallum et al v. city of detroit et al
as 2:2015cv12672
Plaintiff: Anthony McCallum and Elaine McCallum
Defendant: city of detroit, Stephen Geelhood, Amy Matelic and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Smith v. Geehood et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2008cv14696
Plaintiff: Terry Tyrone Smith
Defendant: Stephen Geehood, Bryan Watson, Byron McGhee and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?