Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Budnick v. Elite AFH LLC et al
as 2:2022cv00475
Plaintiff:
Aurelia A Budnick and Aurelia Angeles Budnick
Defendant:
Elite AFH LLC, Joji Dresler, Joseph Enriquez and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
(PC) Mills v. Clarke et al
as 1:2020cv00498
Defendant:
Shaka Senghor, J. Manangan, R. Juarez and others
Plaintiff:
Darryl Ray Mills
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Mills v. Pfeffer et al
as 1:2020cv00195
Defendant:
Moore, Shaka Senghor, S. Silva and others
Plaintiff:
Darryl Ray Mills
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Good Film Productions US, Inc. et al v. Good Films LLC et al
as 2:2018cv06159
Defendant:
Scott Budnick, Does 1-10, inclusive and Good Films LLC
Plaintiff:
Good Film Productions US, Inc. and Good Film Productions Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 44
IBEW Local 1245 v. USDC-CAFR
as 18-71547
:
In re: IBEW LOCAL 1245
Petitioner:
IBEW LOCAL 1245
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, FRESNO
Real Party In Interest:
BECKY GREER, TIMOTHY BUDNICK, ROSARIO SAENZ and others
Budnick v. Clark et al
as 2:2017cv00013
Plaintiff:
Tom Budnick
Defendant:
Doug Clark, West Springfield MA PD, Baystate Noble Hospital Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rigel Marine Services Inc v. M Y Thomas Crosby V et al
as 2:2011cv09060
Defendant:
Julius J Budnick, KBD Coastal LLC and M Y Thomas Crosby V
Plaintiff:
Rigel Marine Services Inc
Budnick v. Your Management, LLC et al
as 2:2008cv00590
Plaintiff:
Lary Budnick and Lary Budnick
Defendant:
Your Management, LLC, Kelly White and Alarik Skarstrom
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Budnick, et al v. Town of Carefree, et al
as 06-15841
Plaintiff - Appellant:
F. G. BUDNICK, a married man and TEMPO INC., a Michigan corporation
Defendant - Appellee:
TOWN OF CAREFREE, a body corporate, EDWARD C. MORGAN, personally and in his official capacity as Mayor and Town Councilmember, BOB COADY and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
