Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv02292
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 c-6ed Discrimination in Education
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv02291
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 c-6ed Discrimination in Education
Bundy v. Prince George's County, Maryland et al
as 8:2025cv02217
Plaintiff:
Lisa Renee Bundy
Defendant:
Prince George's County, Maryland, Officer Gordon and Shean Poole
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Hairston v. Wolf et al
as 1:2024cv03420
Defendant:
Asamu, Curtis Henson, Robert Smead and others
Plaintiff:
Dennis Hairston
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Ochoa v. Bundy et al
as 8:2022cv02812
Plaintiff:
Yohana Andrade Ochoa
Defendant:
Jamaal Lamont Bundy, UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE and United States Post Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Tort Action
Wade et al v. Truist Bank et al
as 8:2022cv00287
Plaintiff:
Rossi Wade and Daughter (Jane Doe)
Defendant:
Truist Bank, Suntrust Bank and BB&T Merger, Suntrust "Truist" Bank and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Insurance Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv03750
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Wade v. Truist Bank et al
as 8:2020cv00656
Defendant:
Anna R. Cablik, Suntrust Corp., Steven C. Voorhees and others
Plaintiff:
Rossi Wade
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Allstate Insurance Company v. Rochkind et al
as 1:2017cv03599
Plaintiff:
Allstate Insurance Company
Defendant:
Stanley Rochkind , Rhoda Rochkind , Dear Management & Construction Company and others
Cause Of Action: 5 U.S.C. § 8705
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv01374
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
