Cases 11 - 20 of 42
Atwood v. United States of America et al
as 2:2017cv00074
Plaintiff:
David Garland Atwood, II
Defendant:
United States of America, Bureau of Prisons, David Potts and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Diaz v. United States of America
as 1:2017cv00041
Plaintiff:
Jesus Manuel Diaz
Defendant:
United States of America, Federal Bureau of Prisons, The Geo Group Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv01772
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Cotton v. Hutchinson et al
as 4:2016cv00191
Plaintiff:
Juliet R Cotton
Defendant:
Jaynell Hutchinson, Jody R. Upton, Howard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jay Cooper, et al v. USA, et al
as 15-41096
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAY S. COOPER and TERESA WARD COOPER
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, JEH CHARLES JOHNSON, SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, PATRICK R. DONAHOE, Postmaster General and Chief Executive Officer of the United States Postal Service and others
Medrano v. Volunteers of America et al
as 3:2015cv00261
Plaintiff:
Ricardo Medrano
Defendant:
Volunteers of America, Federal Bureau of Prisons, Mrs Bray and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2014cv00772
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2014cv00570
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
William Risby v. USA, et al
as 13-10340
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIAM M. RISBY
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, FEDERAL CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION FORT WORTH and others
Brown v. Nix, et al
as 5:2013cv00016
Plaintiff:
Ardell Brown
Defendant:
John Nix and Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
