Cases 51 - 60 of 1,820
Deem v. Garrido
as 23-30169
Petitioner / Appellant:
Steven Lynn Deem, also known as Steve Deem
Respondent / Appellee:
F. J. Garrido, Bureau of Prisons
Moore v. United States Bureau of Prisons et al
as 3:2023cv00072
Petitioner:
Bernard L. Moore
Defendant:
United States Bureau of Prisons, United States Marshals Service, Talahatchie Correctional and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Adams v. Shelby
as 23-20108
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Alex Adams
Defendant / Appellee:
Tammy Shelby, Central Grievance Office, Michael Carvajal, Federal Bureau of Prisons Director, Mike Piasiensk, Inspector General and others
Spalding v. Johnson County Sheriff
as 23-10268
Petitioner / Appellant:
David Lyman Spalding
Respondent / Appellee:
Johnson County Sheriff and Bureau of Prisons
Cabello v. Tellez
as 23-50155
Petitioner / Appellant:
Archie Cabello
Respondent / Appellee:
Regional Director Tellez, Bureau of Prisons
Said v. Moreno et al
as 1:2023cv00038
Plaintiff:
Islam Yaser-Ab Said
Defendant:
Dr. FNU Moreno, Dr. FNU Wheat, Dr. FNU Winger and others
3Rd Party Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-50130
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Pitts v. Bureau of Prisons
as 3:2023cv00390
Plaintiff:
Shannon Pitts
Defendant:
Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pierce v. Federal Bureau of Prisons
as 1:2023cv00175
Petitioner:
James Pierce
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Spalding v. Johnson County Sheriff et al
as 3:2023cv00284
Petitioner:
David Lyman Spalding
Respondent:
Johnson County Sheriff and Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
