Cases 1 - 10 of 115
Havens v. Morriss et al
as 5:2024cv06143
Respondent:
Kelly Morriss and Federal Bureau of Prisons
Petitioner:
Wendell Dean Havens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Thomas v. Yrigollen et al
as 4:2024cv00487
Defendant:
Kyle Yrigollen, Warden (2010-2012), Warden (2010) and others
Plaintiff:
Stephen Thomas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Goodwin v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 4:2024cv00273
Plaintiff:
Joe Lewis Goodwin
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons and USP Leavenworth
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Havens v. Falkenrath
as 2:2024cv04009
Petitioner:
Wendell Dean Havens
Respondent:
Doris Falkenrath and Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Speakes v. Bureau of Prisons
as 6:2023cv03112
Petitioner:
Joshua S Speakes
Defendant:
Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Dunn v. Sanders et al
as 4:2022cv01081
Plaintiff:
Micheal L. Dunn
Defendant:
Warden Linda Sanders and Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Urbina v. Bureau of Prisons Physician
as 6:2022cv03238
Plaintiff:
Ramiro R Urbina
Defendant:
Bureau of Prisons Physician
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Moon v. Debre et al
as 4:2021cv00808
Defendant:
Katherine Siereveld, Kathy Hill, Russell Wyatt and others
Plaintiff:
Darnell W. Moon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hamell-El v. United States of American Federal Bureau of Prisons
as 4:2020cv01471
Defendant:
United States of America Federal Bureau of Prisons
Plaintiff:
Gary Hamell-El
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Ray v. Bureau of Prisons
as 4:2020cv00667
Petitioner:
Steven C. Ray, Jr.
Respondent:
Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
