Cases 31 - 40 of 50
Judd v. Holder et al
as 2:2010cv01483
Petitioner:
Keith Russell Judd
Respondent:
Eric Holder, Harley G. Lappin, Federal Bureau of Prisons and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Moore v. Bureau of Prisons et al
as 3:2010cv05406
Petitioner:
Maxie A Moore
Respondent:
Bureau of Prisons, Marion Feathers and Harry Lappin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Bell v. US Courts et al
as 2:2010cv00604
Petitioner:
James Dalton Bell
Respondent:
US Courts, Federal Bureau of Prisons and All Agents of US Courts
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Tarrer v. Bureau of Prisons
as 3:2010cv05154
Petitioner:
Larry Edward Tarrer
Respondent:
Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Rodman v. United States Federal Bureau of Prisons
as 2:2010cv00321
Plaintiff:
Richard L Rodman
Defendant:
United States Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv01860
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Fjerstad v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 2:2009cv01270
Plaintiff:
Michael B Fjerstad
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, Theresa Talplacido and Harlan Penn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hunter v. United States Bureau of Prisons et al
as 2:2009cv00202
Plaintiff:
Michael Howard Hunter
Defendant:
United States Bureau of Prisons and William H Grant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dayan v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 2:2009cv00406
Plaintiff:
Edward Dayan
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, United States of America and Attorney General of the U.S. Department of Justice
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Vega v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 3:2009cv05076
Petitioner:
Juan D Vega, Jr
Respondent:
Federal Bureau of Prisons and Community Corrections Manager
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
