Cases 21 - 30 of 2,874
Isby v. Cain
as 24-60003
Petitioner:
Anthony Isby
Respondent:
Burl Cain, Commissioner, Mississippi Department of Corrections
Washington v. Cain et al
as 1:2023cv00370
Plaintiff:
Catina Washington
Defendant:
Burl Cain, John Hunt, Jeworski Mallett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Brown v. Cain
as 1:2023cv00371
Plaintiff:
James D. Brown
Defendant:
Burl Cain
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Pitchford v. Cain
as 23-70009
Petitioner:
Terry Pitchford
Respondent:
Burl Cain, Commissioner, Mississippi Department of Corrections and Lynn Fitch, Attorney General for the State of Mississippi
Pitchford v. Cain
as 23-60639
Petitioner:
Terry Pitchford
Respondent:
Burl Cain, Commissioner, Mississippi Department of Corrections
Pinkston v. Reeves et al
as 3:2023cv03143
Plaintiff:
Chaz Pinkston
Defendant:
Governor Tate Reeves, Commissioner Burl Cain, Kelly Christopher and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis v. Cain et al
as 3:2023cv00472
Petitioner:
Curtis Davis, Jr.
Respondent:
Burl Cain and Attorney General for the State of Mississippi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Varnado v. Cain
as 2:2023cv00195
Plaintiff:
Carlos Varnado
Defendant:
John Doe and Burl Cain
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Douglas v. Cain et al
as 3:2023cv03130
Plaintiff:
William Frederick Douglas
Defendant:
Commissioner Burl Cain, Jasmine Magee, Kelley Christopher and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Holliday v. Cain et al
as 3:2023cv03126
Plaintiff:
Michael Holliday
Defendant:
Burl Cain and Lynn Fitch
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
