Cases 1 - 10 of 40
WINSLOW v. LONNIE BUSH REAL ESTATE, LLC
as 1:2024cv00334
Plaintiff:
WILLIS R. WINSLOW
Defendant:
LONNIE BUSH REAL ESTATE, LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Premier Healthcare Alliance, L.P. v. Bush Brothers & Company
as 3:2024cv00393
Plaintiff:
Premier Healthcare Alliance, L.P.
Defendant:
Bush Brothers & Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Bush v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2024cv00170
Plaintiff:
Kyle Bush
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
SSA Noticing and US Attorney-Social Security Noticing
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Tepe v. Corker et al
as 3:2023cv00423
Plaintiff:
Mawule Tepe
Defendant:
Clifton L. Corker, Travis R. McDonough, Katherine A. Crytzer and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00496
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Bush v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2022cv00469
Plaintiff:
Larena Schaiavone Bush
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
SSA Noticing and US Attorney-Social Security Noticing
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSDC)
Bush v. Saul
as 5:2021cv00100
Plaintiff:
Neil Edwin Bush
Defendant:
Andrew M. Saul and Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv00080
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Gosnell v. Bush
as 1:2020cv00001
Defendant:
George Washington Bush
Plaintiff:
Michael James Gosnell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1402 Medical Malpractice
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv00321
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
