Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Vega-Ruiz v. Northwell Health Systems
as 24-12
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LISSETTE VEGA-RUIZ
Defendant / Appellee:
NORTHWELL HEALTH SYSTEMS, LONG ISLAND JEWISH VALLEY STREAM and LONG ISLAND JEWISH MEDICAL CENTER
Vega-Ruiz v. Northwell Health Systems
as 24-3
Plaintiff / Appellee:
LISSETTE VEGA-RUIZ
Defendant / Appellant:
NORTHWELL HEALTH SYSTEMS, LONG ISLAND JEWISH VALLEY STREAM and LONG ISLAND JEWISH MEDICAL CENTER
Vega-Ruiz v. Northwell Health
as 20-315
Defendant / Appellee:
Northwell Health, (formerly North ShoreLong Island Jewish Health System), Long Island Jewish Medical Center and Long Island Jewish Valley Stream
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Lissette Vega-Ruiz
Vega-Ruiz v. Northwell Health et. al.
as 2:2019cv00537
Defendant:
Long Island Jewish Valley Stream, Northwell Health and Long Island Jewish Medical Center
Plaintiff:
LISSETTE VEGA-RUIZ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1201 Civil Rights (Disability)
USA v. Carlos Vega-Ruiz
as 18-40475
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
CARLOS ALBERTO VEGA-RUIZ
RUIZ v. GEOVERA SPECIALTY INSURANCE COMPANY
as 1:2018cv20522
Plaintiff:
JUSSEF VEGA RUIZ
Defendant:
GEOVERA SPECIALTY INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Vega Ruiz v. Geovera Specialty Insurance Company
as 1:2018cv20131
Plaintiff:
Jussef Vega Ruiz
Defendant:
Geovera Specialty Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv01804
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 794
Reverse Mortgage Solutions, Inc. v. VEVega-Ruiz et al
as 3:2016cv02157
Plaintiff:
Reverse Mortgage Solutions, Inc.
Defendant:
Judith Vega-Ruiz, United States of America, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Santiago Vega-Ruiz v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 14-73214
Petitioner:
SANTIAGO VEGA-RUIZ
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
