Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 20
BRYANT v. WARDEN et al
as 1:2018cv03377
Defendant: WARDEN, C. A. PENFOLD and MR. L. GLENN
Plaintiff: ELMER BRYANT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BRYANT v. WARDEN et al
as 1:2018cv03324
Defendant: WARDEN, C. A. PENFOLD and MR. L. GLENN
Plaintiff: ELMER BRYANT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bryant v. Warden et al
as 3:2018cv00872
Defendant: Warden, C A Penfold and L Glenn
Plaintiff: Elmer Bryant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bryant v. Warden et al
as 3:2018cv00828
Defendant: Warden, C A Penfold and L Glenn
Plaintiff: Elmer Bryant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SHANNON v. BROWN et al
as 1:2018cv01780
Defendant: J. BROWN, BETHANY CHIDLEY, CORIZON MEDICAL DIRECTOR and others
Plaintiff: MARK SHANNON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bryant v. Warden et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2018cv00426
Plaintiff: Elmer Bryant
Defendant: Warden, C A Penfold and L Glenn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BRYANT v. WARDEN et al
as 1:2018cv00342
Plaintiff: ELMER BRYANT
Defendant: C. A. PENFOLD and WARDEN
Miscellaneou: WESTVILLE CF (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bryant v. Superintendent et al
as 3:2018cv00077
Plaintiff: Elmer Bryant
Defendant: Superintendent and C A Penfold
Miscellaneous_party: WESTVILLE E-FILE(Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ADAMS v. PENFOLD et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2017cv00368
Plaintiff: BENJAMIN ADAMS
Defendant: STANLEY KNIGHT, J. PELTIER and C. A. PENFOLD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
VAUGHN v. BUGHER et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2017cv01533
Respondent: ROBERT BUGHER, GAGNON, STANLEY KNIGHT and others
Miscellaneou: PLAINFIELD CF (Court Use Only)
Petitioner: BOBBY VAUGHN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?