Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Hilton #115832 v. Jackson et al
as 1:2018cv00933
Plaintiff:
Edward Hilton #115832
Defendant:
Shane Jackson and Earnest C. Brooks Correctional Facility
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stockenauer #116242 v. E. C. Brooks Correctional Facility et al
as 1:2018cv00796
Plaintiff:
Gordon Stockenauer #116242
Defendant:
Shane Jackson, Unknown Parties, E. C. Brooks Correctional Facility and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stockenauer v. E. C. Brooks Correction Fac. et al
as 4:2018cv12140
Defendant:
Warden, John and Jane Does, Deputy Warden and others
Plaintiff:
Gordon L. Stockenauer
Ryan v. Carson City Correctional Facility et al
as 2:2017cv10562
Plaintiff:
Sean Michael Ryan
Defendant:
Carson City Correctional Facility, FNU Holmes, FNU Spurlling and others
Rogers #372900 v. Ojibway Correctional Facility et al
as 2:2014cv00171
Plaintiff:
Demetrius Rogers #372900
Defendant:
Ojibway Correctional Facility, Muskegon Correctional Facility and E. C. Brooks Correctional Facility
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brooks v. Oakland University
as 2:2013cv10701
Plaintiff:
LaShae C Brooks and ZB
Defendant:
Oakland University
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Solomon v. Berghuis et al
as 2:2012cv12049
Plaintiff:
Martin Solomon
Defendant:
Mary Berghuis, Earnest C. Brooks Correctional Facility, Michigan Department of Corrections and others
Ranke v. Pitt et al
as 2:2011cv12763
Plaintiff:
Reuben Ranke
Defendant:
B Pitt, T Luth, T McInerny and others
Carson #193706 v. Caruso et al
as 1:2010cv01027
Plaintiff:
David Allen Carson #193706
Defendant:
Patricia Caruso, Michigan Department of Corrections, E. C. Brooks Correctional Facility and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Carson v. Caruso et al CASE TRANSFERRED
as 2:2010cv13897
Plaintiff:
David Carson
Defendant:
Patricia Caruso, Michigan Department of Corrections, E C Brooks Correctional Facility and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
