Cases 1 - 10 of 21
Wilks, Timothy v. Hannula, J. et al
as 3:2024cv00122
Plaintiff:
Timothy B. Wilks
Defendant:
Dr. J. Hannula, Dr. R. Maddikunta, RN E. Cook and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Young, Steve v. Rudolph et al
as 3:2022cv00596
Plaintiff:
Steve Young
Defendant:
Officer Rudolph, Supervisor Ms. Mellenberger and C. Hickey-Wilbur
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith, Walter v. Pugh, Jeffrey et al
as 3:2022cv00542
Plaintiff:
Walter Smith
Defendant:
Jeffrey Pugh, Cindy O'Donnell, Reed Richardson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Howell v. Haziga, et al
as 1:2022cv00987
Plaintiff:
Corey Jerome Howell
Defendant:
P Haziga, RN, Terry R Dulle, Joan M Hunnula, MD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Marraksh, Abu Talib Al v. O'Donnell, Cindy et al
as 3:2022cv00279
Plaintiff:
Abu Talib Al Marraksh and Lee Crouthers
Defendant:
Cindy O'Donnell, Brad Hompe, Jeffrey Moore and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith, Walter v. Pugh, Jeffrey et al
as 3:2019cv00947
Defendant:
T. Brunnerk, Mrs. Reimer, Sgt. Waters and others
Plaintiff:
Walter Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv00926
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Franklin v. Hannula et al
as 3:2017cv00562
Plaintiff:
Johnathan Franklin
Defendant:
Joan Hannula , NP Bentley , Jamie Barker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Franklin v. Hannula et al
as 2:2017cv00107
Plaintiff:
Johnathan L Franklin
Defendant:
Joan Hannula, NP Bentley, Jamie Barker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cuesta v. Richardson et al
as 2:2017cv00104
Plaintiff:
Tomas D Cuesta, Sr
Defendant:
Reed Richardson, J Baker, B Homes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
