Cases 1 - 9 of 9
THOMPSON v. NEW JERSEY ATTORNEY GENERAL et al
as 3:2023cv20468
Plaintiff:
RANDY C. THOMPSON
Defendant:
NEW JERSEY ATTORNEY GENERAL, NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES, MONMOUT COUNTY PROSECUTORS OFFICE (MCPO) and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
THOMPSON v. CITY OF ASBURY PARK et al
as 3:2022cv06040
Plaintiff:
RANDY C. THOMPSON
Defendant:
CITY OF ASBURY PARK, CHIEF DAVID KELSO, CAPTAIN JEFFERY WHITE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
THOMPSON v. ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICALS LP et al
as 2:2019cv09615
Plaintiff:
DAVID C THOMPSON
Defendant:
MERCK & CO. INC. D/B/A MERCK, SHARP & DOHME CORPORATION, ASTRAZENECA LP and ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICALS LP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
THOMPSON v. CAMDEN COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
as 1:2016cv06481
Plaintiff:
NEAL C. THOMPSON
Defendant:
CAMDEN COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
THOMPSON v. CAMDEN COUNTY JAIL
as 1:2016cv06370
Plaintiff:
LYNNELL C. THOMPSON
Defendant:
CAMDEN COUNTY JAIL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
THOMPSON et al v. ORGANON USA, INC. et al
as 2:2013cv03286
Plaintiff:
JACQUELINE S. THOMPSON and JOHN C. THOMPSON
Defendant:
ORGANON USA, INC., ORGANON PHARMACEUTICALS USA, INC., ORGANON INTERNATIONAL, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
THOMPSON v. STATE OF NEW JERSEY et al
as 2:2011cv01070
Plaintiff:
DAVID C. THOMPSON
Defendant:
STATE OF NEW JERSEY, D.O.C., NORTHERN STATE PRISON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
THOMPSON v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 2:2009cv04736
Plaintiff:
STEVEN C. THOMPSON
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
THOMPSON v. EVA'S VILLAGE AMD SHELTERING PROGRAM et al
as 2:2009cv01510
Plaintiff:
STEVEN C. THOMPSON
Defendant:
EVA'S VILLAGE AMD SHELTERING PROGRAM, DERRICK WILLIAMS, GREGORY ANDERSON and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
