Cases 1 - 10 of 24
Thomas v. Syngenta Crop Protection LLC et al
as 3:2022pq02925
Special Master:
Randi Ellis
Plaintiff:
Steven C. Thomas
Defendant:
Syngenta Crop Protection LLC and Syngenta AG
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Account Receivable
Rowling v. Jeffreys et al
as 3:2021cv01047
Plaintiff:
Clifford Antonio Rowling
Defendant:
Rob Jeffreys, Dr. C. Thomas Holt, Dr. Maureen Tweedy and others
Interested Party:
Lawrence Adamczyk
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Schnerigner v. The City of Wood River et al
as 3:2020cv01191
Defendant:
C. Thomas, Wood River Police, The City of Wood River and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Schnerigner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Black & Pink v. Baldwin et al
as 1:2018cv06986
Defendant:
Kess Roberson, Jessica Stover, Daniel Q Sullivan and others
Plaintiff:
Black & Pink
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tapp et al v. Stover et al
as 3:2018cv01309
Plaintiff:
Brian A. Tapp and David P Hoffman
Defendant:
Jessica D. Stover, C. Thomas Holt, Daniel Q. Sullivan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Stover et al
as 3:2018cv01023
Plaintiff:
Mark D. Smith
Defendant:
Jessica D. Stover, C. Thomas Holt, John Baldwin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Starks et al
as 1:2016cv04385
Plaintiff:
Gregory Williams
Defendant:
Officer Starks, Sgt. Broadway, Doctor Martinez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv02071
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Thomas et al v. AbbVie Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv10477
Plaintiff:
Earl C. Thomas and Leslie E. Thomas
Defendant:
AbbVie Inc., Abbott Laboratories, AbbVie Products LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv07317
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
