Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Sue C. Clark Properties, LLC et al v. City of Brookhaven, Georgia et al
as 1:2022cv04409
Plaintiff:
Sue C. Clark Properties, LLC, Carl N. Clark Estate Properties, LLC, David B. Wolfson and others
Defendant:
City of Brookhaven, Georgia, John A. Ernst, Jr. and Christian M. Sigman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
BEY v. DOERUN MUNICIPAL COURT et al
as 1:2017cv00189
Plaintiff:
TZEDKIYAH EL BEY
Defendant:
DOERUN MUNICIPAL COURT, MAGISTRATE COURT, C CLARK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BEY v. DOERUN MUNICIPAL COURT et al
as 7:2017cv00179
Plaintiff:
TZEDKIYAH EL BEY
Defendant:
DOERUN MUNICIPAL COURT, MAGISTRATE COURT, C CLARK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Flat Rock African Methodist Episcopal Church, Inc. v. Clark et al
as 3:2016cv00004
Petitioner:
Flat Rock African Methodist Episcopal Church, Inc.
Respondent:
Tarmara C. Clark, Bank of America, N.A. , Jerry W. Cleveland and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv00110
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv03767
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Patterson Dental Supply, Inc. v. Criston C. Clark, DMD, LLC et al
as 4:2014cv00080
Plaintiff:
Patterson Dental Supply, Inc.
Defendant:
Criston C. Clark, DMD, LLC and Criston C. Clark
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013cv00061
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Harpo v. Lee et al
as 1:2012cv01069
Plaintiff:
Wilhy Harpo
Defendant:
Kelly A. Lee, Cynthia D. Wright, Beth Baer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv02428
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
