Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Cedeno v. Alvarez et al
as 1:2022cv00769
Plaintiff:
Noel Cedeno
Defendant:
Tabatha Alvarez and Elain C. Evans
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cedeno v. Friedman et al
as 1:2022cv00046
Plaintiff:
Noel Cedeno
Defendant:
Stuart A Friedman, Ronnie Ducoff, Timothy J. McGinty and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Evans v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2020cv01092
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R.Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Timothy C. Evans
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Brown v. Evans et al
as 4:2018cv00789
Plaintiff:
Kevin N. Brown
Defendant:
James C. Evans, Dena R. Calabrese and Paul C. Conn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Evans v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2016cv00378
Plaintiff:
Henry C Evans, III
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Dumas v. Carfolo et al
as 4:2014cv02828
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel Dumas
Defendant:
Mark Carfolo, Rebecca Doherty, Jennifer McLaughlin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dumas v. Carfolo et al
as 4:2014cv01742
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel Dumas
Defendant:
Mark Carfolo, Jennifer McLaughlin, Rebecca Doherty and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wiltz v. Moundbuilders Guidance Center et al
as 2:2013cv00523
Plaintiff:
Cassandra R Wiltz
Defendant:
Moundbuilders Guidance Center, Behavioral Health Care Partners, Inc., Forman and Associates Consulting and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Evans v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as 1:2013dp20131
Plaintiff:
Beatrice C. Evans
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. , DePuy Inc. , DePuy International Limited and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Christian v. Wellington et al
as 4:2011cv02421
Petitioner:
Duniek A. Christian
Respondent:
Randell L. Wellington and James C. Evans
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
