Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Liptok v. City of Pottsville, PA, et al
as 3:2023cv01303
Plaintiff:
John J. Liptok
Defendant:
City Of Pottsville Pa., et al, City Council, Dorothy Botto and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
LIPTOK v. CITY OF POTTSVILLE PA., ET AL
as 2:2023cv02942
Plaintiff:
JOHN J. LIPTOK
Defendant:
CITY OF POTTSVILLE PA., ET AL, CITY COUNCIL, DOROTHY BOTTO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
BURRELL v. PALMER et al
as 2:2014cv06414
Plaintiff:
JASON BURRELL
Defendant:
C. PALMER, JAMES FAUST, CAMERON LINSEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PALMER v. WEINTRAUB et al
as 2:2013cv04939
Plaintiff:
WALTER C. PALMER
Defendant:
MATHEW WEINTRAUB and NICHOLE LAKEAUWITZ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PALMER, et al v. ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES
as 2:2011cv64535
Defendant:
LARRY C PALMER , DEBRA S. PALMER and ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
PALMER v. FIBREBOARD CORPORATION
as 2:2010cv72132
Plaintiff:
JULIO C. PALMER
Defendant:
FIBREBOARD CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
PALMER v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2010cv40113
Plaintiff:
JULIO C. PALMER
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
Palmer v. Parole Board of the Com. of Pa. et al
as 1:2008cv02013
Petitioner:
Shawn C. Palmer
Respondent:
Parole Board of the Com. of Pa. and Tom Corbett
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
PALMER v. ABCO INDUSTRIES, INC. et al
as 2:2008cv72325
Plaintiff:
MARY C. PALMER
Defendant:
ABCO INDUSTRIES, INC., AEROQUUIP INTERNATIONAL, INC., AEROQUIP CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
LANDES et al v. KEYSTONE NAZARETH BANK & TRUST COMPANY et al
as 5:2008cv00697
Plaintiff:
MIRIAM D. LANDES and JESSE J. LANGMAN
Defendant:
KEYSTONE NAZARETH BANK & TRUST COMPANY, C. PALMER ZIGMUND, STEPHEN W. WIENER and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
