Cases 1 - 7 of 7
PRIORITY HEALTHCARE DISTRIBUTION INC. v. CENTRAL CAROLINA SURGICAL EYE ASSOCIATES, P.A. et al
as 1:2013cv00351
Plaintiff:
PRIORITY HEALTHCARE DISTRIBUTION, INC.
Defendant:
CENTRAL CAROLINA SURGICAL EYE ASSOCIATES, P.A. , SOUTHEASTERN CATARACT LASER CENTER, PLLC , J. MARK MCDANIEL, JR. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv01084
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Trustee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Interested_party:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Debtor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158 Bankruptcy Appeal from Judgment/Order
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv00544
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Interested_party:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Debtor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
James McDaniel, Jr. v. John Blust
as 10-1776
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES MARK MCDANIEL, JR. and C. RICHARD EPES
Defendant - Appellee:
JOHN M. BLUST, EDWIN RAY GATTON, DIRK W. SIEGMUND and others
Defendant:
WILLIAM STANALAND, III
MCDANIEL et al v. BLUST et al
as 1:2009cv00507
Plaintiff:
JAMES MARK MCDANIEL, JR. and C. RICHARD EPES
Defendant:
JOHN M. BLUST, EDWIN R. GATTON, DIRK W. SIEGMUND and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Tort/Non-Motor Vehicle
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv00320
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Debtor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Trustee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Interested Party:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0157 Motion for Withdrawal of Reference
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2007cv00255
Movant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Trustee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0157 Motion for Withdrawal of Reference
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
