Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Williams v. PTI Union, LLC et al
as 4:2023cv01137
Defendant:
Black Creek Corporation, PTI Union, LLC sued individually and as successor-in-interest to PHARMA TECH INDUSTRIES, INC. f/k/a BLACK CREEK CORPORATION, as successor-in-interest to DIRECT PHARMACEUTICAL CORPORATION and as successor-in interest to ENVI DIVERSIFIED, INC f/k/a PHA and Pharma Tech Industries, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Candace C. Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Asbestos Litigation
Williams v. Corizon Medical Services, Inc. et al
as 6:2020cv03068
Plaintiff:
Ernest C Williams
Defendant:
Ian Wallace, Darrell D Case, Richard Fritz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. United States Government
as 4:2018cv00722
Plaintiff:
Michael C. Williams
Defendant:
United States Government
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Duncan et al
as 1:2017cv00209
Plaintiff:
Brian C. Williams
Defendant:
Shane M. Duncan and Unknown Taylor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. USA
as 1:2016cv00158
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
LaDonta C. Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Metro Publishing Group et al v. Murphy
as 4:2015cv01886
Plaintiff:
Metro Publishing Group Inc. and Michael C Williams
Defendant:
James W. Murphy , I B Property LLC and Michael Ernest Boyd
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Williams v. TGI Friday's Inc.
as 4:2015cv01469
Plaintiff:
Jason C. Williams
Defendant:
TGI Friday's Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0227
Williams v. Social Security Administration
as 4:2015cv01115
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Plaintiff:
Layatte C Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Williams v. Wallace
as 4:2015cv00534
Petitioner:
Brian C. Williams
Respondent:
Ian Wallace
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Williams v. Colvin
as 4:2014cv00524
Plaintiff:
Steve C. Williams
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
