Cases 1 - 10 of 23
Shaw v. Healthpark Medical Center LLC. et al
as 2:2022cv00798
Plaintiff:
William S. Shaw
Defendant:
Healthpark Medical Center LLC., Rene Rodriguez, James Iverson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Woods v. Lake C.I. et al
as 3:2022cv01384
Plaintiff:
Dannis G. Woods
Defendant:
Lake C.I., Medical Staff, Nurse C.J. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Woods v. Lake C.I. Security Officials et al
as 3:2022cv01338
Plaintiff:
Dannis C. Woods
Defendant:
Lake C.I. Security Officials, Nurses, Medical Staff and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shaw v. Healthpark Medical Center et al
as 2:2022cv00106
Plaintiff:
William S. Shaw
Defendant:
Healthpark Medical Center, c.j scerbo, James Iverson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Tort Action
Shaw v. Scerbo et al
as 2:2022cv00105
Plaintiff:
William S. Shaw
Defendant:
cj scerbo, James Iverson, jim fitzgerald and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Tort Action
Shaw v. scerbo et al
as 2:2022cv00103
Plaintiff:
William S. Shaw
Defendant:
c.j scerbo, James Iverson, jim fitzgerald and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Tort Action
Brown v. Smith et al
as 3:2022cv00110
Plaintiff:
Leroy L. Brown
Defendant:
D.E. Smith, H.C. Taylor, C.C. Barnhart and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cadlerock Joint Venture II, LP v. Cecil Fielder et al
as 8:2020mc00082
Defendant:
C.J. USA, Inc., Betz Trucking, Inc. and Cecil Fielder
Plaintiff:
Cadlerock Joint Venture II, LP
Gatlyn v. DiMaria et al
as 3:2020cv00338
Defendant:
S. DiMaria, Sergeant Carlton, M. Henck and others
Plaintiff:
Peter Gatlyn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 9:2019cv81450
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
