Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Michael Johnson v. Comodo Group Inc, et al
as 20-2113
Intervenor / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
COMODO GROUP INC
Plaintiff / Appellee:
MICHAEL JOHNSON, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated
Defendant / Appellee:
COMODO CA INC
Michael Johnson v. Comodo Group Inc, et al
as 20-8021
Respondent:
MICHAEL JOHNSON, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated and COMODO CA INC
Petitioner:
COMODO GROUP INC
Intervenor:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Gilley v. CA, Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv01286
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Gilley
Defendant:
Jens Alder, Christopher Lofgren, Jeffrey Katz and others
Jacob Scheiner Retirement Account v. CA, Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv01251
Defendant:
Christopher Lofgren, Jens Alder, Jeffrey Katz and others
Plaintiff:
Jacob Scheiner Retirement Account
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Gusinsky v. CA, Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv01221
Defendant:
Jens Alder, Jeffrey G. Katz, Christopher B. Lofgren and others
Plaintiff:
Vladimir Gusinsky
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Blackbird Tech, LLC v. LEDi2, Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv00965
Plaintiff:
Blackbird Tech, LLC
Defendant:
LEDi2, Inc. and LEDi2 CA Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
CAMPBELL v. AETNA LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY et al
as 2:2016cv01442
Plaintiff:
MARK CAMPBELL
Defendant:
AETNA LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY and CA, INC. SHORT-TERM DISABILITY PLAN
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Clouding Corp. v. CA Inc. d/b/a/ CA Technologies
as 1:2014cv01175
Plaintiff:
Clouding Corp.
Defendant:
CA Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145
Janice Pini v. First Unum Life Insurance
as 13-4560
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JANICE C. PINI
Defendant - Appellee:
FIRST UNUM LIFE INSURANCE, THE CA INC GROUP LONG TERM DISABILITY PLAN and CA INC
Clouding IP LLC v. CA Technologies Inc.
as 1:2013cv01338
Plaintiff:
Clouding IP LLC
Defendant:
CA Technologies Inc. and CA, Inc. d/b/a/ CA Technologies
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
