Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Wilson v. Meritt, et al.
as 24-435
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID W. WILSON
Defendant / Appellee:
LURA MERITT, Nurse Practitioner, STAF B-Fac., CALIFORNIA SUBSTANCE ABUSE TREATMENT FACILITY AND STATE PRISON AT CORCORAN, MONICA FISHBURN and others
(PC) Wilson v. Meritt, et al.
as 1:2022cv00455
Plaintiff:
David Wayne Wilson
Defendant:
Lura Meritt, California Substance Abuse Treatment Facility and State Prison at Corcoran, Public Entity of CDCR in Corcoran Calif and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wilson v. Meritt et al
as 4:2022cv02396
Plaintiff:
David Wayne Wilson
Defendant:
Lura Meritt, California Substance Abuse Treatment Facility and State Prison at Corcoran, Public Entity of CDCR in Corcoran Calif and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2004cv03339
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 09-16404
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Amicus Curiae:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 09-16404
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Amicus Curiae - Pending:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Michael Tilton v. James Tilton, et al
as 08-16923
Petitioner - Appellant:
MICHAEL E. TILTON
Respondent - Appellee:
JAMES E. TILTON, Secretary, California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation and KEN CLARK, Warden, California Substance Abuse Treatment Facility and State Prison at Corcoran
Balbo v. California Substance Abuse Treatment Facility and State Prison at Corcoran
as 3:2007cv04194
Plaintiff:
John Michael Balbo
Defendant:
California Substance Abuse Treatment Facility and State Prison at Corcoran
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
