Cases 1 - 10 of 12
BENSON et al v. NEW JERSEY SCHOOL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY et al
as 1:2017cv05439
Plaintiff:
KEITH ERROL BENSON , CAMDEN HIGH SCHOOL ALUMNI ASSOCIATION OF CAMDEN, NJ A NJ NONPROFIT CORPORATION , CAMDEN HIGH SCHOOL PTO LTD and others
Defendant:
NEW JERSEY SCHOOLS DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY , CHARLES MCKENNA , CAMDEN CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CRISDON v. CAMDEN CITY BOARD OF EDUCATION
as 1:2016cv08130
Plaintiff:
MYRON CRISDON
Defendant:
CAMDEN CITY BOARD OF EDUCATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
CRISDON v. CAMDEN CITY BOARD OF EDUCATION
as 1:2015cv02119
Plaintiff:
MYRON CRISDON
Defendant:
CAMDEN CITY BOARD OF EDUCATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BUSSIE v. DRIVER MOTOR VEHICLE AGENCY et al
as 2:2014cv04534
Plaintiff:
TARON BUSSIE
Defendant:
DRIVER MOTOR VEHICLE AGENCY, CHILD SUPPORT AGENCY, CAMDEN CITY POLICE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HARRIS v. CAMDEN CITY BOARD OF EDUCATION
as 1:2014cv03659
Plaintiff:
DARIN HARRIS
Defendant:
CAMDEN CITY BOARD OF EDUCATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CRISDON v. CAMDEN COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION
as 1:2013cv04427
Plaintiff:
MYRON N. CRISDON
Defendant:
CAMDEN CITY BOARD OF EDUCATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv03264
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1401
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv05060
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1401
JONES v. CAMDEN CITY BOARD OF EDUCATION
as 2:2011cv02398
Plaintiff:
IRVING COURTLEY JONES
Defendant:
CAMDEN CITY BOARD OF EDUCATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003
H.A. v. CAMDEN CITY BOARD OF EDUCATION
as 1:2010cv00733
Plaintiff:
H.A.
Defendant:
CAMDEN CITY BOARD OF EDUCATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
