Cases 1 - 10 of 60
NEILIO v. CAMDEN COUNTY et al
as 1:2023cv02702
Plaintiff:
MORGAN NEILIO
Defendant:
CAMDEN COUNTY, KAREN TAYLOR, CAMDEN COUNTY BOARD OF FREEHOLDERS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DEMBY v. COUNTY OF CAMDEN et al
as 1:2020cv13892
Defendant:
EDWARD T. MCDONNELL, COUNTY OF CAMDEN, CITY OF CAMDEN and others
Plaintiff:
JAMOR J. DEMBY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv16384
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
MENDOZA v. CITY OF CAMDEN et al
as 1:2017cv00255
Plaintiff:
ANGELA MENDOZA
Defendant:
CITY OF CAMDEN, CAMDEN COUNTY JAIL, CAMDEN COUNTY SHERRIFF OFFICE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ALPHEAUS v. CAMDEN COUNTY BOARD OF FREEHOLDERS et al
as 1:2017cv00180
Plaintiff:
JANNAI ALPHEAUS
Defendant:
CAMDEN COUNTY BOARD OF FREEHOLDERS and CAMDEN COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DAVID v. CAMDEN COUNTY BOARD OF FREEHOLDERS et al
as 1:2017cv00032
Plaintiff:
MIASIA M. DAVID
Defendant:
CAMDEN COUNTY BOARD OF FREEHOLDERS and CAMDEN COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RODRIGUEZ v. CAMDEN COUNTY JAIL et al
as 1:2017cv00073
Plaintiff:
YAMIL RODRIGUEZ
Defendant:
CAMDEN COUNTY JAIL, CITY OF CAMDEN, CAMDEN COUNTY BOARD OF FREEHOLDERS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
VILLAFANE v. OWENS et al
as 1:2016cv09275
Plaintiff:
JOSE A VILLAFANE
Defendant:
DAVID OWENS, CAMDEN COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY and CAMDEN COUNTY BOARD OF FREEHOLDERS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JONES v. OWENS et al
as 1:2016cv08959
Plaintiff:
MUHAYMAN I. JONES
Defendant:
DAVID OWENS and CAMDEN COUNTY BOARD OF FREEHOLDERS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WILLIAMS v. CFG HEALTH SYSTEMS LLC et al
as 1:2016cv08980
Plaintiff:
TERRELL WILLIAMS
Defendant:
CFG HEALTH SYSTEMS LLC, COUNTY OF CAMDEN, CAMDEN COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
