Cases 51 - 60 of 161
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv15676
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv05487
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv02814
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706
AKHAVAN TAHERI BOROJENI v. POMPEO et al
as 1:2020cv02813
Defendant:
MIKE POMPEO, JOHN DOE, CARL C. RISCH and others
Plaintiff:
AZADEH AKHAVAN TAHERI BOROJENI
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0701
NIKVAND v. POMPEO et al
as 1:2020cv02812
Defendant:
MIKE POMPEO, JOHN DOE, CARL C. RISCH and others
Plaintiff:
NIMA NIKVAND
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Ball v. BARR et al
as 1:2020cv23867
Defendant:
Acting Secretary CHAD F. WOLF, Rachel Rojas, Assist. Sec. Consul Carl C Risch and others
Plaintiff:
Sherice L Ball and Saba ####
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329
CHAUDHRY et al v. POMPEO et al
as 1:2020cv02535
Defendant:
MIKE POMPEO, CONN SCHRADER, PAUL W. JONES and others
Plaintiff:
SANA SAEED CHAUDHRY and HASAN SAJJAD
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0701
QAZI et al v. POMPEO et al
as 1:2020cv02493
Plaintiff:
JAVARIAH BUSHRA QAZI and MUHAMMAD NOOH KAZI
Defendant:
MIKE POMPEO, PAUL W. JONES, CARL C. RISCH and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0701
Afghan and Iraqi Allies v. Michael Pompeo, et al
as 20-5251
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Afghan and Iraqi Allies, Under Serious Threat Because of Their Faithful Service to the United States, on Their Own and on Behalf of Others Similarly Situated
Defendant / Appellant:
United States Department of State, Kenneth T Cuccinelli, II, Chad F. Wolf and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv06845
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
