Cases 1 - 10 of 161
Benavidez v. Lippert Components, Inc.
as 3:2024cv00322
Plaintiff:
CARLOS BENAVIDEZ
Defendant:
LIPPERT COMPONENTS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Gipson v. Lake County Sheriffs Department
as 1:2024cv00152
Plaintiff:
Carlos Antonio Gipson
Defendant:
Lake County Sheriffs Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gipson v. Lake County Sheriffs Department
as 2:2024cv00139
Plaintiff:
Carlos Antonio Gipson
Defendant:
Lake County Sheriffs Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Freeman v. Eaton
as 3:2024cv00240
Plaintiff:
de Carlos Freeman
Defendant:
Eaton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Robinson v. Warden
as 3:2024cv00106
Petitioner:
Carlos Robinson
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Aburto et al v. Thornton et al
as 2:2023cv00375
Plaintiff:
Danielle Aburto, Carlos Aburto and Danielle L Aburto
Defendant:
Patrick Thornton and Meade Electric Company, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
CERNY-CARBAJAL et al v. KUEHNLEIN TRUCKING, INC. et al
as 1:2023cv01724
Plaintiff:
Allyn Cerny-Carbajal, Carlos Carbajal-Armendariz and CDE Industries, LLC
Defendant:
Kuehnlein Trucking, Inc. and Shawn Never
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
v. Georg et al
as 2:2023cv00231
Defendant:
Carlo Georg, Gino P Burelli, II, MARY K. BURELLI and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330 Breach of Contract
Georg v. Burelli et al
as 2:2023cv00232
Plaintiff:
Carlo Georg
Defendant:
Gino P Burelli, II, MARY K. BURELLI, BATTAGLIA CAPITAL, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00197
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Not Classified By Court:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
