Cases 41 - 50 of 59
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv00355
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv00332
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv00331
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
WRIGHT v. RODDEN
as 4:2014cv00027
Defendant:
DANIEL RODDEN
Plaintiff:
CARLTON WRIGHT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Tanner et al v. Biomet Inc et al
as 3:2014cv00426
Plaintiff:
Carlton Tanner and Helena Tanner
Defendant:
Biomet Inc , Biomet Manufacturing Corp and Biomet Orthopedics LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
PAN-AMERICAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY v. THE HOWARD BENEFITS GROUP CORPORATION et al
as 1:2013cv01575
Defendant:
HEALTHCARE SOULUTIONS INTERNATIONAL, INC., CARLTON HOWARD, LISA HOWARD and others
Plaintiff:
PAN-AMERICAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Doyle v. Biomet Orthopedics LLC et al
as 3:2013cv00945
Plaintiff:
Carlton Doyle
Defendant:
Biomet Orthopedics LLC , Biomet Inc and Biomet Manufacturing Corp
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
STEVENSON v. COLVIN
as 1:2013cv01166
Defendant:
CAROLYN W. COLVIN
Miscellaneou:
SSA (Court Use Only)
Plaintiff:
CARLTON STEVENSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Gary City of et al v. Bonaventura et al
as 2:2013cv00057
Plaintiff:
Gary City of , East Chicago City of , Carlton Mahone and others
Defendant:
The Honorable Mary Beth Bonaventura and The Honorable John Pera
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv00169
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
