Cases 21 - 30 of 138
CRUMP v. LUMBERTON CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION
as 1:2022cv00286
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY CRUMP
Defendant:
LUMBERTON CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION and OFFICER CARTER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GIVENS-BEY v. FNU - CARTER et al
as 1:2022cv00008
Plaintiff:
ARTHUR LEE GIVENS-BEY, IV
Defendant:
FNU - CARTER, FNU - REVELS, FNU - ADKINS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nolon v. Owens et al
as 5:2021ct03110
Plaintiff:
Ardie D. Nolon and Ardie Defronso Nolon
Defendant:
Lerohn Litinchum, Tawana Freeman, Carie Spruill and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Galeas v. Carter et al
as 5:2021ct03081
Defendant:
Martrina B. Carter, Larry K. Swain, William M. Mouring and others
Plaintiff:
Jorge Galeas, Jr. and Jorge Gevara
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HOWARD v. MCDOUGLE et al
as 1:2020cv01180
Defendant:
C/O BURKE, C/O GIBSON, C/O EDWARDS and others
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH PAUL HOWARD, III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wright v. Granville County et al
as 5:2020ct03362
Defendant:
Edward Cash, Steven Hayes, Jr., Charles Royster Noblin, Jr. and others
Plaintiff:
Admr John H Wright
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
- Wright v. Granville County et al
as 5:2020cv00661
Plaintiff:
Admr John H Wright
Defendant:
Edward Cash, Steven Hayes, Jr., Charles Royster Noblin, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HOWARD v. MCDOUGLE et al
as 1:2020cv01084
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH PAUL HOWARD, III
Defendant:
C/O GIBSON, C/O EDWARDS, SGT. MCDOUGLE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lee et al v. Hooks et al
as 5:2020ct03307
Plaintiff:
Jose L. Galvin, Isaam Chaplin and Dominique Lee
Defendant:
John Doe 1-2, Erik A. Hooks, D. Clark and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomas v. Brandon et al
as 5:2020ct03106
Defendant:
Dale A. Willard, J. Nathan Cuthbertson, William Brandon and others
Plaintiff:
Daniel Isaiah Thomas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
