Cases filed in the D.C. Circuit Courts
Cases 31 - 40 of 291
Wisconsin Voters Alliance, et al v. Kamala Harris, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 21-5056
Plaintiff / Appellee: Arizona Voter Integrity Alliance, John Wood, Georgia Voters Alliance and others
Interested Party: Mohrman, Kaardal & Erickson, P.A. and Erick G. Kaardal
Defendant / Appellee: Jake Corman, Senate majority Leader of Pennsylvania Senate, in his official capacity, Bryan Carter, Speaker of the Pennsylvania House of Representatives, in his official capacity, Tony Evers, Governor of Wisconsin, in his official capacity and others
CARTER et al v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2021cv00422
Defendant: UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF STATE, ANTONY J. BLINKEN and others
Plaintiff: Samuel Carter and Adeba Nasimi
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1101
WISCONSIN VOTERS ALLIANCE et al v. PENCE et al Featured Case We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2020cv03791
Plaintiff: BRENDA SAVAGE, RICHARD W KUCKSDORF, DEBI HAAS and others
Defendant: BUTCH MILLER, U.S HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, LEE CHATFIELD and others
Respondent: Mohrman, Kaardal & Erickson, P.A. and Erick G. Kaardal
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Type: Civil Rights Voting
PAGE v. COMEY et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2020cv03460
Defendant: KEVIN CLINESMITH, JANE DOE 1-10, JOE PIENTKA, III and others
Plaintiff: CARTER PAGE
Petitioner: ANTHONY L. VIOLA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
AMERICAN FEDERATION OF GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES v. FEDERAL SERVICE IMPASSES PANEL et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2020cv02683
Plaintiff: AFGE COUNCIL 222 and AMERICAN FEDERATION OF GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES
Defendant: FEDERAL LABOR RELATIONS AUTHORITY, FEDERAL SERVICE IMPASSES PANEL and MARK ANTHONY CARTER
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0701
Kevin Mccarthy, et al v. Nancy Pelosi, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 20-5240
Defendant / Appellee: Nancy Pelosi, The Honorable, in her official capacity as Speaker of the House of Representatives and Member of the United States House of Representatives for the California 12th Congressional District, Cheryl L. Johnson, The Honorable, in her official capacity as Clerk of the United States House of Representatives and Paul D. Irving, in his official capacity as Sergeant-at-Arms of the United States House of Representatives
Plaintiff / Appellant: David S. Schweikert, The Honorable, in his official capacity as Member of the United States House of Representatives for the Arizona 6th Congressional District, Kevin Owen Mccarthy, The Honorable, in his official capacity as House Minority Leader and Member of the United States House of Representatives for the California 23rd Congressional District, James Shipley Swayze and others
Amicus Curiae: Individual Rights Foundation, Reason Foundation and Center for Constitutional Jurisprudence
TAYLOR v. LYLES
as 1:2020cv01786
Plaintiff: DOROTHY TAYLOR
Defendant: CYNTHIA CARTER LYLES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jeannie McIver v. Mark Esper
as 20-5185
Defendant / Appellee: Ashton B. Carter, Secretary, United States Department of Defense
Plaintiff / Appellant: Jeannie Mciver
NATIONAL WEATHER SERVICE EMPLOYEES ORGANIZATION v. FEDERAL SERVICE IMPASSES PANEL et al
as 1:2020cv01563
Plaintiff: NATIONAL WEATHER SERVICE EMPLOYEES ORGANIZATION
Defendant: FEDERAL SERVICE IMPASSES PANEL and MARK ANTHONY CARTER
Intervenor Defendant: NATIONAL WEATHER SERVICE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
TAITT et al v. ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2020cv01557
Plaintiff: MARLON CARTER, LYNELL COOPER, PAUL GRAHAM and others
Defendant: THE ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN, THE REPUBLIC OF SUDAN, REPUBLIC OF SUDAN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605 A

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?