Cases 1 - 10 of 1,246
USA v. Melvin Castellanos
as 24-11983
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
MELVIN CASTELLANOS
CASTELLANO v. CENCORA, INC. et al
as 2:2024cv02568
Plaintiff:
MAURISA CASTELLANO
Defendant:
CENCORA, INC. and THE LASH GROUP, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Default
Castellanos v. Loreal USA, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv04773
Plaintiff:
Marie Castellanos
Defendant:
Loreal USA, Inc., LOREAL USA Products, Inc. and SoftSheen-Carson, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
USA v. Jeffersson Castellanos
as 24-11865
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
JEFFERSSON ARANGO CASTELLANOS
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01331
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv03268
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Nadeau v. Dezer Platinum Realty, LLC et al
as 1:2024cv22010
Plaintiff:
JonPaul Marcel Nadeau
Defendant:
Dezer Platinum Realty, LLC, Cindy Sebatier Castellanos and Sebatier Castellanos, P.A.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 0501 Copyright Infringement
Castellanos Gutierrez, et al. v. Garland
as 24-3247
Petitioner:
LILIANA MARISOL CASTELLANOS GUTIERREZ, XIMENA SHECCITH LOPEZ CASTELLANOS and VALERIA POLETTE LOPEZ CASTELLANOS
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv04060
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Damian-Lopez v. Suma Cleaning Services, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv21806
Plaintiff:
Lorena Damian-Lopez
Defendant:
Suma Cleaning Services, Inc., Carlos Castellanos and Maria Isabel Lopez
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0002 Fair Labor Standards Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
