Cases 1 - 10 of 17
GMH Capital Partners LP v. Fitts et al
as 1:2024cv00290
Plaintiff:
GMH Capital Partners LP
Defendant:
Jaclyn Fitts, CBRE Capital Advisors, Inc. and CBRE, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
CBRE, Inc. v. Keller
as 1:2021cv02818
Defendant:
Roy Keller
Plaintiff:
CBRE, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 1
Turtle Factory Building Corp v. CBRE Inc
as 21-1188
Defendant / Appellant:
CB RICHARD ELLIS CARMODY LLC, now known as CBB Real Estate LLC and CBRE INC
Defendant:
MCGRATH REAL ESTATE HOLDINGS LLC
Plaintiff / Appellee:
THE TURTLE FACTORY BUILDING CORPORATION
CBRE, Inc. v. Zachariah Bowyer et al
as 2:2019cv09108
Defendant:
Paige Avery, Serena Lipton, Corinne Austin and others
Plaintiff:
CBRE, Inc.
Amit Patel v. CBRE, Inc.
as 19-2594
Plaintiff / Appellant:
AMIT PATEL
Defendant / Appellee:
CBRE, INC.
CBRE INC, et al v. Cabot East Broward 2 LLC
as 18-90009
Petitioner:
CBRE INC and GLORIA HERNANDEZ
Respondent:
CABOT EAST BROWARD 2 LLC, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated and CABOT EAST BROWARD 34 LLC
CBRE, Inc. v. Richard Rizika et al
as 2:2018cv01730
Defendant:
Placer Labs, Inc., Mitchell Hernandez, Beta Retail, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
CBRE, Inc.
Cabot East Broward 2 LLC et al v. Cabot et al
as 1:2017mc00492
Plaintiff:
Cabot East Broward 2 LLC and Cabot East Broward 34 LLC
Defendant:
Carlton P Cabot, Timothy J Kroll, Cabot Investment Properties LLC and others
Miscellaneou:
STEVEN YUROWITZ
Cause Of Action: M 08-85 Motion to Compel
RW Norfolk Holding, LLC v. CBRE, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv00370
Defendant:
CBRE, Inc. and United States Postal Service
Plaintiff:
RW Norfolk Holding, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
CBRE, Inc v. Hughes Seattle, Inc. et al
as 2:2017cv01127
Plaintiff:
CBRE Inc
Defendant:
Hughes Seattle Inc , Owen Rice Enterprises Inc , Owen Rice and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1030
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
