Cases filed in Arkansas
Cases 1 - 10 of 45
Manning v. Shock et al
as 4:2024cv00406
Plaintiff: Shaleen Cecile Manning
Defendant: Andy Shock and Lona McCastlain
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Parker v. USA
as 4:2024cv00104
Petitioner: Cecil Samuel Parker, Jr
Defendant: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Gaby v. USA
as 2:2023cv02033
Petitioner: Cecil W. Gaby
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Smith v. Monsanto Company
as 1:2021cv01029
Plaintiff: Cecil Gene Smith
Defendant: Monsanto Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bannister et al v. Melton et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2019cv00217
Defendant: Cecil Ruminer, KaRene Ruminer, Virginia Melton and others
Plaintiff: Lu Edith Bannister and Mark Steven Bannister
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2018cv00240
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv01055
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Proctor v. King, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2018cv04029
Plaintiff: Cecil Wayne Proctor
Defendant: Nurse S. King and Nurse Chelsey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Proctor v. Foltz et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2018cv04015
Plaintiff: Cecil W. Proctor
Defendant: Steven Foltz and Nurse King
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lewis v. Dream Weavers Inc et al
as 4:2017cv00495
Defendant: Dream Weavers Inc, Becky Whealer and Dream Weavers Inc doing business as Cecil's Fine Jewelry
Plaintiff: Rachel Lewis
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?