Cases filed in Pennsylvania
Cases 61 - 67 of 67
INDIANA CARPENTERS WELFARE FUND v. CEPHALON, INC.
as 2:2007cv04775
Plaintiff: INDIANA CARPENTERS WELFARE FUND
Defendant: CEPHALON, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
EMPLOYERS MUTUAL CASUALTY COMPANY et al v. CEPHALON, INC. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2007cv04492
Plaintiff: EMPLOYERS MUTUAL CASUALTY COMPANY, EMCASCO INSURANCE COMPANY and UNION INSURANCE COMPANY
Defendant: CEPHALON, INC.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
AVMED, INC. v. CEPHALON, INC. et al
as 2:2007cv03793
Plaintiff: AVMED, INC.
Defendant: CEPHALON, INC., BARR LABORATORIES, INC., MYLAN LABORATORIES, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15 Antitrust Litigation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2007cv03747
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
KRATTENMAKER v. BALDINO et al
as 2:2007cv00101
Plaintiff: CATHERINE KRATTENMAKER
Defendant: FRANK BALDINO, FRANK BALDINO, FRANK BALDINO and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity - Stockholders Suits
APOTEX, INC. v. CEPHALON, INC. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2006cv02768
Plaintiff: APOTEX, INC.
Defendant: CEPHALON, INC., BARR LABORATORIES, INC., MYLAN LABORATORIES, INC. and others
Petitioner: BROOKS R. BRUNEAU and ROBERT SHEPHERD
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
KING DRUG COMPANY OF FLORENCE, INC vs. CEPHALON, INC., ET AL We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2006cv01797
Plaintiff: AMERICAN SALES CO., INC., BURLINGTON DRUG COMPANY, INC., CVS CAREMARK CORPORATION and others
Defendant: BARR LABORATORIES, INC., BARR PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., CEPHALON, INC. and others
Petitioner: TADEKA PHARMACEUTICAL NORTH AMERICA, INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15 Antitrust Litigation

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?