Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Maritz Holdings, Inc. v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's London Subscribing to Policies Numbered B122FI0115 and FI0115116 et al
as 4:2018cv00825
Plaintiff:
Maritz Holdings, Inc.
Defendant:
Arthur J. Gallagher Risk Management Services, Inc. and Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's London Subscribing to Policies Numbered B122FI0115115 and FI0115116
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Associated Milk Producers Inc. v. Ace European Group Limited et al
as 0:2017cv05579
Plaintiff:
Associated Milk Producers Inc.
Defendant:
Ace European Group Limited , XL Insurance America, Inc. and Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's of London Subscribing to Policy No. B0509FINSR1600036, believed to be Syndicate 2003 XLC and Syndicate 2007 NVA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Foresight Energy, LLC v. Certain London Market Insurance Companies et al
as 4:2017cv02266
Defendant:
Certain London Market Insurance Companies, Ironshore Insurance LTD, Allied World Assurance Company, LTD and others
Plaintiff:
Foresight Energy, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Cohen v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's, London et al
as 0:2017cv03358
Plaintiff:
James H. Cohen
Defendant:
Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's, London and CIMA Companies, Inc., The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ProSource Technologies, LLC v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's London Subscribing to Policies PGIARK04292-00 and PGIXS00178-00
as 0:2016cv04356
Plaintiff:
ProSource Technologies, LLC
Defendant:
Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's London Subscribing to Policies PGIARK04292-00 and PGIXS00178-00
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
New Hope Apostolic of God, Inc. v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's London Subscribing to Policy Number CBBLM03635
as 4:2016cv00661
Plaintiff:
New Hope Apostolic of God, Inc.
Defendant:
Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's London Subscribing to Policy Number CBBLM03635
Counter_claimant:
Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's London Subscribing to Policy Number CBBLM03635
Counter_defendant:
New Hope Apostolic of God, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
The Doe Run Resources Corporation v. Those Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's, London Subscribing to Policy Number PRPNA1300417 et al
as 4:2016cv00585
Plaintiff:
The Doe Run Resources Corporation
Defendant:
Those Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's, London Subscribing to Policy Number PRPNA1300417, Those Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's, London Subscribing to Policy Number PRPNA1300429, Those Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's, London Subscribing to Policy Number S1EMG03119065 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's and those companies severally subscribing to Boeing Policy Number MARCW150053 and related policies governing the cargo et al v. Southern Pride Trucking, Inc. et al
as 8:2016cv00116
Cross Claimant:
Bauer Built, Inc. and Road Star Carrier, Inc.
Defendant:
Bauer Built, Inc., Road Star Carrier, Inc., Southern Pride Trucking, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's and those companies severally subscribing to Boeing Policy Number MARCW150053 and related policies governing the cargo and The Boeing Company
Cross Defendant:
Southern Pride Trucking, Inc., Southern Pride Trucking, Inc., Thunder Rolls Express, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
Northern States Power Company v. AEGIS Insurance Services, Inc.
as 3:2015cv00106
Plaintiff:
Northern States Power Company
Defendant:
AEGIS Insurance Services, Inc.
3rd_party_defendant:
Admiral Insurance Company, Allstate Insurance Company, Northwestern National Insurance Company and others
3rd_party_plaintiff:
AEGIS Insurance Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's, London subscribing to Certificate No. LCL002153 v. White Oak Holdings, LLC
as 1:2015cv00148
Plaintiff:
Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's, London subscribing to Certificate No. LCL002153
Defendant:
White Oak Holdings, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
