Cases 1 - 10 of 59
Warner v. Chambers-Smith et al
as 2:2024cv01565
Plaintiff:
Danny Lee Warner, Jr
Defendant:
Annette Chambers-Smith, Tracy Reveal, Chae Harris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Harris et al
as 1:2024cv00165
Plaintiff:
Christian Smith
Defendant:
Chae Harris, C.O. McKinley, C.O. J. Umstead and others
Interested Party:
State of Ohio
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wesley Triplett v. Chae Harris
as 24-3004
Petitioner:
WESLEY TRIPLETT
Respondent:
CHAE HARRIS, Warden
Todd King, Sr. v. Chae Harris
as 23-3758
Petitioner / Appellant:
TODD A. KING, SR.
Respondent / Appellee:
CHAE HARRIS, Warden
Johnson v. Warden
as 3:2023cv00251
Plaintiff:
Michael Vincent Johnson
Defendant:
Warden LECI Chae Harris and Warden, Lebanon Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Branch v. Ohio Department of Rebabilitation and Corrections, et al
as 1:2023cv00465
Plaintiff:
Chad Branch
Defendant:
ODRC (Ohio Department of Rehabilitation & Corrections), Director Annette Chambers-Smith, Warden LECI Chae Harris and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Damian Carlton v. Chae Harris
as 23-3594
Petitioner / Appellant:
DAMIAN CARLTON
Respondent / Appellee:
CHAE HARRIS, Warden
In re: Dechaun Toliver
as 23-3514
Petitioner:
In re: DECHAUN TOLIVER
Respondent:
CHAE HARRIS, Warden
Johnson Sr. v. Warden, Lebanon Correctional Institution
as 3:2023cv01103
Petitioner:
Alfred A. Johnson Sr.
Respondent:
Warden Chae Harris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lumbus v. Weishar, et al.
as 1:2023cv00196
Plaintiff:
Brian Lumbus, Jr.
Defendant:
Steve Weishar, GCI RIB Lieutenant Elizabeth Wyant, Keith J. Foley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
