Cases 1 - 10 of 28
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv01180
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Chaney v. Oklahoma City City of et al
as 5:2023cv00861
Plaintiff:
James E Chaney, Jr
Defendant:
Oklahoma City City of, Municipal Attorney's Office for the City of Oklahoma, Andrew Haskins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Chaney v. DRG Invest et al
as 5:2023cv00842
Plaintiff:
James E Chaney, Jr
Defendant:
DRG Invest Owner of Property doing business as Kentucky Pines Apartment, Goldman and Assoc, Linda Givens and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Chaney v. Stitt et al
as 5:2023cv00824
Plaintiff:
Larry Chaney
Defendant:
Kevin Stitt, Larry Morris, Adam Luck and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kelley v. Stitt et al
as 5:2023cv00747
Plaintiff:
Phillip Lee Kelley, George Isbill, Rocky Ward and others
Defendant:
Kevin Stitt, Larry Morris, Adam Luck and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Padron v. Glancy et al
as 5:2022cv00219
Plaintiff:
Carolyn Padron
Defendant:
Chet Glancy, Sammy Weygand, Dustin Fuller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Chaney v. Martin
as 6:2021cv00075
Respondent:
Jimmy Martin
Petitioner:
Donald Chaney
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Chaney v. Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
as 5:2021cv00175
Plaintiff:
James E Chaney, Jr
Defendant:
Commissioner of the Social Security Administration and Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Chaney v. Martin
as 4:2021cv00072
Respondent:
Jimmy Martin
Petitioner:
Donald Chaney
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Littlejohn v. Pocola, Town of et al
as 6:2017cv00424
Plaintiff:
John Clifford Littlejohn
Defendant:
Pocola, Town of , Michael Roeder, Jonathan Hoog and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
