Cases 21 - 30 of 42
Hamilton v. Texas Department of Public Safety et al
as 1:2014cv00260
Plaintiff:
Charles Hamilton
Defendant:
Steve McGraw, State of Texas and Texas Department of Public Safety
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hamilton v. Stephens
as 1:2013cv00645
Petitioner:
Charles Hamilton, Jr.
Notice Only Party:
Laura Haney
Respondent:
William Stephens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hamilton v. Johnson
as 4:2012cv01122
Plaintiff:
Louis Charles Hamilton, II
Defendant:
Donnell Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hamilton v. North Texas State Hospital et al
as 7:2012cv00053
Plaintiff:
Louis Charles Hamilton
Defendant:
North Texas State Hospital, Jim Smitt, Keli Boyd and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Hamilton v. North Texas State Hospital et al
as 4:2012cv01014
Plaintiff:
Louis Charles Hamilton
Defendant:
North Texas State Hospital, Jim Smitt, Keli Boyd and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Hamilton v. Garcia et al
as 4:2012cv00977
Plaintiff:
Louis Charles Hamilton, II
Defendant:
Adrain Garcia, Anorga, Crump and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hamilton v. State of Texas et al
as 4:2011cv04256
Plaintiff:
Louis Charles Hamilton, II
Defendant:
State of Texas, Harris County, City of Houston Police Dept and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hamilton v. Harris County Texas et al et al
as 4:2011cv04420
Plaintiff:
Louis Charles Hamilton, II
Defendant:
Harris County Texas et al, Harris County Sheriff Office's and Adrain Garcia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Hamilton v. State of Texas et al
as 1:2011cv00510
Plaintiff:
Louis Charles Hamilton, II
Defendant:
State of Texas, Harris County, City of Houston Police Dept and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hamilton v. U S America
as 1:2011cv00442
Plaintiff:
Louis Charles Hamilton, II
Defendant:
U S America
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
