Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Charles Howard, IIIIn re: Charles Howard, III
as 19-3235
Petitioner:
In re: CHARLES HOWARD, III
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
HOWARD et al v. ALARCON
as 2:2019cv15815
Plaintiff:
CHARLES HOWARD and TRACY WORRILL HOWARD
Defendant:
JUAN ALARCON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HOWARD et al v. ALARCON
as 3:2019cv15815
Plaintiff:
CHARLES HOWARD and TRACY WORRILL HOWARD
Defendant:
JUAN ALARCON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HOWARD v. ABBOTT LABORATORIES et al
as 2:2018cv06986
Plaintiff:
CHARLES HOWARD
Defendant:
ABBOTT LABORATORIES, ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICALS LP, ASTRAZENECA LP and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
USA v. Charles Howard, III
as 17-2521
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
CHARLES HOWARD, III
HOWARD v. USA
as 2:2015cv01603
Defendant:
USA
Plaintiff:
CHARLES HOWARD, III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
HOWARD v. USA
as 2:2015cv01604
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
CHARLES HOWARD, III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Charles Stinson v. David Wakefield, et al
as 12-1559
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHARLES HOWARD STINSON
Defendant - Appellee:
DAVID J. WAKEFIELD and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
STARR v. ELK ASSOCIATES et al
as 1:2009cv00202
Plaintiff:
CHARLES HOWARD STARR
Defendant:
ELK ASSOCIATES, SACRED HEART CATHOLIC CHURCH, CHARLES HABERBERGER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
HOWARD et al v. ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC et al
as 2:2009cv70031
Plaintiff:
CHARLES HOWARD and CHRISTINE O HOWARD
Defendant:
ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC, AC&S, INC, AMSTED INDUSTRIES, INC. and others
ThirdParty Defendant:
OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS CORPORATION and MANVILLE CORPORATION ASBESTOS DISEASE COMPENSATION FUND
Cross Claimant:
H.K. PORTER CO., INC. and EAGLE-PICHER INDUSTRIES, INC.
Cross Defendant:
H.K. PORTER CO., INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
