Cases 1 - 8 of 8
McDonald v. Knauf Gips KG et al
as 2:2020cv03214
Plaintiff:
Mardechria Charles McDonald
Defendant:
Knauf Gips KG and Knauf Plasterboard Tianjin Co., Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
McDonald v. Vannoy et al
as 2:2017cv01523
Plaintiff:
Charles McDonald
Defendant:
Darrel Vannoy
Respondent:
Attorney General State of Louisiana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Learn et al v. BP Exploration & Production, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv02222
Plaintiff:
Michael Harrison Learn , Glenn Lee , Yvette Lee and others
Defendant:
BP Exploration & Production, Inc., BP America Production Company, BP p.l.c. and others
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 2701 - Oil Pollution Act
Demery et al v. American International Specialty Lines Co. et al
as 2:2009cv08444
Defendant:
American International Specialty Lines Co., Insurance Co. of the State of Pennsylvania, Lexington Insurance Company and others
Plaintiff:
Elvin Demery, Elvin Demery, Harry Dellihoue and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
hutchison et al v. Graham et al
as 3:2009cv00715
Plaintiff:
kay hutchison and larry durr
Defendant:
Jerry Graham and Charles McDonald
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Dugas et al v. Georgia Gulf Lake Charles L L C et al
as 2:2007cv01663
Plaintiff:
Nathan Dugas, Nathan Dugas, Nathan Dugas and others
Defendant:
Georgia Gulf Lake Charles L L C, Georgia Gulf Lake Charles L L C, Georgia Gulf Lake Charles L L C and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Wedgeworth v. McDonald et al
as 3:2007cv01490
Plaintiff:
Willie Wedgeworth
Defendant:
Charles McDonald, Sheriffs Dept Richland Parish, Gilley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Grissom v. Hamm et al
as 3:2007cv00358
Plaintiff:
Johnny Grissom
Defendant:
Lloyd Hamm, Chris Vincent, Chris Vincent and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
