Cases 1 - 6 of 6
Jeanty v. City of Utica
as 21-1974
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Vladimir Jeanty
Defendant / Appellee:
Police Officer Michael Cerminario, badge #1301, individually and in his official capacity, City of Utica, Mark Williams, Chief of Police, Utica Police Department; individually and in his official capacity and others
Defendant:
John Doe #7, Corporation Counsel, City of Utica, individually and in his official capacity, Honorable Scott D. McNamara, Oneida County District Attorney, individually and in his official capacity, Grant Garramone, Assistant District Attorney, individually and in his official capacity and others
Jeanty v. City of Utica
as 17-2909
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Vladimir Jeanty
Defendant - Appellee:
Investigator Peter Paladino, badge #6290, individually and in his official capacity, Lieutenant Sean Dougherty, badge #2553, individually and in his official capacity, Mark Williams, Chief of Police, Utica Police Department; individually and in his official capacity and others
Defendant:
John Doe, #1-6, individually and in their capacity and John Doe #7, Corporation Counsel, City of Utica, individually and in his official capacity
Charles Brown v. Carnevale, et al
as 09-35040
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHARLES N. BROWN
Defendant - Appellee:
CARNEVALE, Dr., PRISON HEALTH SERVICES, DICK NOWACK, Nurse and others
Charles Brown v. John Rex, et al
as 08-35809
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHARLES N. BROWN
Defendant - Appellee:
JOHN REX, M.D., GEORGE DEGNER, M.D., JOHN VARGO, M.D. and others
Brown v. Nooth et al
as 3:2008cv00621
Plaintiff:
Charles N. Brown
Defendant:
Mark Nooth, Jamie Miller, Captain Rodriquez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown v. Rex et al
as 3:2007cv00637
Plaintiff:
Charles N. Brown
Defendant:
Rex, Degner, Vargo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
