Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Inner City Contracting LLC v. Charter Township of Northville, MI, et al
as 22-2131
Plaintiff / Appellant:
INNER CITY CONTRACTING LLC
Defendant / Appellee:
CHARTER TOWNSHIP OF NORTHVILLE, MI, FLEIS & VANDENBRINK ENGINEERING, INC. and FLEIS & VANDENBRINK
JS Beck RD LLC v. CHARTER TOWNSHIP OF NORTHVILLE
as 2:2022cv12251
Plaintiff:
JS Beck RD LLC
Defendant:
CHARTER TOWNSHIP OF NORTHVILLE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Inner City Contracting LLC v. Charter Township of Northville, Michigan et al
as 2:2022cv11349
Plaintiff:
Inner City Contracting LLC
Defendant:
Charter Township of Northville, Michigan, Fleis & Vandenbrink Engineering, Inc. and Fleis & Vandenbrink
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Charter Township of Canton, Michigan et al v. McKinsey and Company, Inc.
as 3:2022cv00474
Plaintiff:
Charter Township of Canton, Michigan, City of Livonia, Michigan, Charter Township of Northville, Michigan and others
Defendant:
McKinsey and Company, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Charter Township of Canton, Michigan et al v. McKinsey and Company, Inc.
as 2:2021cv12888
Plaintiff:
Charter Township of Canton, Michigan, City of Livonia, Michigan, Charter Township of Northville, Michigan and others
Defendant:
McKinsey and Company, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Charter Township of Canton, et al v. Purdue Pharma L.P. et al
as 1:2018op46134
Defendant:
Purdue Pharma Inc, McKesson Corporation, RiteAid of Maryland, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
City of Wayne, City of Romulus, Charter Township of Huron, Michigan and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
CHARTER TOWNSHIP OF CANTON et al v. PURDUE PHARMA L.P. et al
as 2:2018cv12938
Defendant:
PAR PHARMACEUTICAL COMPANIES, INC., McKesson Corporation, ACTAVIS PHARMA, INC. f/k/a WATSON PHARMA, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
City of Wayne, City of Romulus, CHARTER TOWNSHIP OF CANTON and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
